Note: USE THIS DOCUMENT TO UNPLUG FROM THE SYSTEM, DECLARE THAT YOU ARE LIVING & TO RECLAIM YOUR ESTATE. Read carefully, change the name and address to your own and in some cases change who the document is addressed to if applicable. If female, change the word "executor" to "executrix" as an executor is a male. Also, this document is a 'starter-kit' that will initially serve as your protection from police, your right to travel, a LEGAL state ID, and much more! However we have a ROYALTY KIT and a DIVINITY KIT. ALL THREE KITS ARE FREE!
Governor’s/Grantor’s Assertion of Rights
DECLARATION OF EXECUTORSHIP. Legal Notice and Warning, as this is on and for the public record Established by a court of record (UCC 1-103, 308, 415 by reference…) (reference to secured rights and public-laws listed below as well as common law) (Declaration to expire as of March 13, 2061 unless renewed by grantor verbally)
FILE AS EVIDENCE UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES OF THE COURT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/AFFIDAVIT
State o California County of Alameda
APPEARING PERSONALLY BEFORE ME the undersigned Notary, on this day of (MONTH, DAY, YEAR) Tubal Cain Mendez, Ex Rel, known to me by verification, a credible living, self-aware MAN, who duly attest acknowledges and or affirms, on his affirmation and acknowledgement, deposes and declares:
I, The Governor/Grantor, Tubal-Cain Mendez, a living breathing self-aware Man, not deceased, not lost at sea, am the Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate associated with the Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Grantor”), of the Legal Person , State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation of the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ/ JUSTIN S MENDEZ (or any variation thereof). The presumption of law is that The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/ Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ/ JUSTIN S MENDEZ (or any variation thereof), This declaration RECLAIMS WHAT IS RIGHTFUL AND DUE TO THE GRANTOR, AS WELL AS overcomes/extinguishes any presumption of the Grantor has been, is, or was absent, having absentee status, abandonment of any kind and or nature, or has been, is, or was deceased.
I Tubal-Cain Mendez, the Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any associated Trust,Estate, Legal-Name, (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation do hereby forthwith established this court of record, documenting, assuming, acknowledging this warranty/grant/Deed[s] as a lawful right. And under acceptance The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof), and acknowledge the aforementioned, the aforegoing, and the attached.
Further there is no law that allows any Human (self-aware or not) to exercise authority over another Human (self-aware or not), and as I, The Grantor make the ultimate Presumption “I the Grantor avow that I The Grantor am a self-aware . That I am The Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof),. That I, The Grantor will never submit to any jurisdiction at any time or in any situation. That my human-rights are never to be trampled and for each instance as well as offence against my secured rights, a penalty and fee assessment of $20,000.00 will be due at the time of such offense[s]. Because I, The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MNDEZ (or any variation thereof), I, The Grantor also declare and affirm total acceptance of the Secured United States Constitutional Rights of the Legal-Person and all protections associated with such rights, and assess the same penalty and fee of $20,000.00 for the violation of such right (each instance and or incident).
I The Grantor further avow as well as affirm that all Public servants are just that, Public servants, trustees.
The Grantor maintains heretofore, henceforth, hereafter and forever that The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ(or any variation thereof), welcomes any claims to the contrary, and all and any unsubstantiated claim[s] will be assessed a one million dollar fee for each and every instance and or occurrence.
The Grantor presumes that corporations and courts operate under presumption of law.
The Grantor presumes that statutory law and or its authority do not apply to The Grantor.
The Grantor presumes that the rules of any non common law tribunal do not apply to The Grantor.
The Grantor presumes that The Grantor is not bound by any so-called order of any non common law tribunal.
The Grantor is not a public servant and any claim to the contrary must be proven by payroll records to include The Grantor’s alleged public servant title and sworn under the penalty of perjury and under full commercial liability.
The Grantor claims common law jurisdiction at every moment and all time[s].
The Grantor waives all compelled benefits of every type and kind.
The Grantor does not waive any rights of the legal person/Legal-Name and or of JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof) or of The Grantor.
The Grantor does not surrender any common or human rights in any proceeding or in any manner or time.
The Grantor does not nor will ever waive time.
The Grantor does not and will not ever plead to courts of contracts.
The Grantor presumes that The Grantor is not bound by any so-called order/ruling/decision of any non-common law tribunal, body, Fiduciary, trustee, and or servants.
The Grantor presumes that any and all public employee/state employee/federal employee and or servant, officers of any corporation/court can only maintain the role of public servant, Public Trustee/fiduciary
The Grantor presumes that ministerial clerks/servants, being public trustees/fiduciary, have no authority over The Grantor or any other self-aware human being.
The Grantor presumes that all Statutes, ACT’S of congress, Codes and United States Codes are in violation of The Grantor common and human rights and not applicable to The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof), and welcomes any claims to the contrary, and if any unsubstantiated claims are false, there will be assessment of Forty thousand dollars for each instance and every occurrence under The Grantor’s fee schedule.
The Grantor does not waive any rights, and reserves all secured rights, common and human rights and forever asserts The Grantor Rights whatever they may be and that of the legal person JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof).
The Grantor does not surrender any common /human rights in any proceeding, discussion, in any venue, or under any circumstances at any time or in any manner.
The Grantor will not and or ever plead to courts of contracts voluntarily, or otherwise.
Anyone refuting any of the aforementioned and or the following issues must do so on the public record, in writing, by way of sworn affidavit under penalties of an assessment of $100,000.00 for each issue and occurrence of perjury/false and misleading information, and or unproven misleading statements/assertions. No other refuting documents will be accepted. Failure to respond within 21 days will be agreement and estoppel.
The aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and submitted by The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer, of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation of the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof) on this ____ day of MONTH, YEAR.
LEGAL NOTICE for your benefit and compliance
Both Common and Federal law provides that it is a crime to violate the Rights of a self-aware human being under the color-of-law. You can be arrested and most-likely charged for this crime and can also be held personally liable for violation of secured rights.
Federal Law, Section 7 of Public Law 93-579 provides that: “It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State or local government agency to deny to any individual any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such individual's refusal to disclose his social security account number.” Federal courts have ruled the Privacy Act applies equally to the private sector.
Warning, you are in violation of Federal Law and persisting with your demand may lead to your arrest and/or civil damages! The law provides that you can and will be held personally responsible and liable, as well as your company or agency.
There is no law requiring an individual to obtain or use a social security number. Any requirement and/or demand that I, The Grantor provide a social security number a violation of one or more of the following laws:
4 CFR 83.9; 5 USC Sec. 552a; 7 CFR 1.123; 7 USC Sec. 2204g; 14 CFR 1212.604; 17 CFR 249.501a; 19 CFR 118.11; 19 CFR 122.25; 19 CFR 24.5; 24 CFR 5.212; 28 CFR 16.53; 28 CFR 513.31; 28 CFR 700.25; 29 CFR 70a.10; 29 CFR 71.12; 31 CFR 1.32; 31 CFR 501.806; 32 CFR 270.19; 32 CFR 310.20; 32 CFR 311.5; 32 CFR 316.6; 32 CFR 317.20; 32 CFR 323.5; 32 CFR 505.2; 32 CFR 701.108; 32 CFR 806b.9; 38 CFR 1.575; 38 CFR 3.216; 38 USC Sec. 5101; 39 CFR 266.4; 45 CFR Part 801; 47 CFR 0.554; 49 CFR 10.29.
Public Law 93-579, Sect. 7, 88 Stat. 1909 (Dec. 31, 1974)
(a) “(1) It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State, or local government agency to deny to anyindividual any right, benefit (like, a passport !) or privilege (like, citizenship, or rights of a Human Being) provided by law because of such ‘individual's refusal to disclose his legal-person’s social security number’”... (Emphases and reference added).
63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees
* *63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247* “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised on behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer.
 Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts.  That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves.  and owes a fiduciary duty to the public.  It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual.  Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute. See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, the judge, in reference to litigants who appear before him and he deliberately concealed material information from them, he was guilty of fraud. McNally v United States 483 U.S.350 (1987)
Congress shall make no law respecting … prohibiting … the right of the people …to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
The numeration in the Constitution, of rights, shall not be denied or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated by the Constitution are reserved to the people.
The Judicial power shall not extend to any lawsuit or equity, or Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
Further there is no law that allows any Human (self-aware or not) to exercise authority over another Human (self-aware or not), and as I The Grantor make the ultimate Presumption “I The Grantor avows that I The Grantor am a self-aware .
You are put on notice to cease and desist with your demands and or presumptions that are contrary to the established facts outlined by the proof contained herein and to seek personal legal counsel if you do not understand or have a comprehension of actual law.
Certification of Acknowledgment
I Tubal-Cain Mendez, attest and affirm that the aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and submitted by The Governor/Grantor, Tubal-Cain Mendez, a living breathing self-aware Man, not deceased, WHO IS ALSO The Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof), and that this is my indefeasible title to my land and or property, and that I am the Lawful owner of the aforementioned estate; and it’s real property and interest . I further acknowledge that this is my freewill act and Deed to execute my acknowledgement of my acceptance of the trust/real property/estate as well as lawful ownership of the real-property/Estate/Corporation/Trust, be it said, be it documented done in/on/and for the record, in this court of record on this ______ day of MONTH, YEAR executed this, the aforegoing INSTRUMENT and acknowledged before me and executed the same as his FREE-WILL, ACT AND DEED .
_____________________________________________________ Tubal-Cain Mendez/Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director /Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder /Chief Executive Officer
In care of: Tubal-Cain 1445 Harrison st #364 Oakland, California Near (94612)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of MONTH, YEAR by Tubal-Cain Mendez, The Governor/Grantor/ Executor / Director / Sole Beneficiary / Sole Shareholder/Chief Executive Officer of any Trust, Estate, Legal-Name, State (Foreign or otherwise) and or corporation associated in any manner or form with the Legal Person known by, referred to or rendered as JUSTIN SCOTT CAIN MENDEZ (or any variation thereof), who is personally known to me.
___________________________________ Notary Public,State of California My commission expires:
LEGAL NOTICE for your benefit and compliance
The Certifying Notary is an independent contractor and not a party to this claim. In fact the Certifying Notary is a Federal Witness Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,” which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States and/or United States of America those rights
protected by the Constitution and U.S. Laws.
======================================================================== IMPORTANT!!!! AT THIS POINT YOU ARE TO FILE A UCC-1 FORM AND RECLAIM YOUR ESTATE THROUGH THE US TREASURY COMPUTERS ! Here is the form: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/ucc/forms/UCC1.pdf
These are the areas that you will be needing to change to reflect your information or your strawmans information, and then making sure that they are black when you print them out. Other times in might be assets or other information that needs to be filled in like a car, boat, home, birth certificate, SSN# application etc. So here is a quick run down of the steps with some do’s and don’ts put in. UCC-1 Sovereignty Steps and Instructions
Sovereignty Introduction History and Background Steps and Instructions Document Templates Birth Certificate Redemption The Common Law The Courts Admiralty/Maritime Law Statutory Legislation The Uniform Commercial Code Legal Language Creating Income
Home and Land Traveling
Sovereign Dos and Don'ts Step #1 Towards Becoming Sovereign File A UCC-1 Financing Statement and it's Associated Documents.
Here is a simple introduction to comprehending the process and reasons for filing one's UCC-1 (Uniform Commercial Code) Financing Statement or 'Security Interest' and and an explanation and set of easy to follow correct steps of The UCC-1 Filing Process, The use of the agreements that go along with UCC-1, and the Copyright Notice. This is all for the purpose of regaining control of your agent in commerce, the STRAWMAN!
Filing a UCC1 Financing Statement is the filing of a legal document into the public as evidence of you regaining control over your Agent in commerce, your strawman. It had been abandoned on the sea (see) of admiralty where it was salvaged by Government and big corps to use for their own gain and benefit.
• By filing the document you are noticing the ‘state’, the public, that you are regaining rightful control over the strawman- birth certificate name for your benefit and not the states and that you are now no longer delinquent.
• By filing you also show that you are the secured party and Principal Creditor to the strawman – vessel – trust – cestue Qui Trust as the Trust was set up to benefit the living spirit within the body of a man and NOT for the benefit of anyone else, government, corporations or your strawman.
• You – the living man, are the beneficiary of the Trust, the Trust being made up of a number of parties including you, your vessel, the state and Commonwealth Governments.
• The strawman is YOUR debtor. Because the living man is NOT to own anything, we have use and possession, as ‘good stewards’ it is the job of your vessel – agent in commerce, acting as a Trustee to the Trust, and whatever assets are being accumulated by the Trust is controlled by the Trustee – your strawman, for YOU as the beneficiary. YOU are therefore the ‘Holder in Due Course’ (HIDC) of the real estate assets held in Trust because the Titles are held in the name of your agent in commerce but the Deed is in YOUR possession and that makes YOU HIDC.
Upon filing a UCC1, you also produce several accompanying documents that are all PRIVATE documents and NOT to be issued into the public. All these documents ae referenced on your UCC1 filing by a code number so there is evidence of there existence, BUT they are to remain PRIVATE.
1. The first is the Security Agreement which is a private document evidencing a contract between you and your dead at law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an agreement that evidences that you have a mutually agreed with the agent in commerce that the vessel – agent in commerce owes you $1B, yep, one billion dollars. It lists a whole range of securities and their values which YOU have the principal lien position over, the whole of the estate and is a principal mechanism of protection against outside predators in the world, particularly on the high seas of admiralty law where there are abundant pirates called Governments and big corporations. Because YOU are the Principal Creditor, any other claimant against your vessel – agent in commerce, can only be a secondary creditor and can only get at your estate WHEN YOUR vessel – agent in commerce has been paid the $1Billion which you receive as beneficiary, then the predator may have access to the estate of the Trust. It is our most effective defense to protect real estate and other property from predators on the high seas.
2. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement. To my knowledge this private agreement between you and your agent in commerce is effected to ensure that you indemnify the public against any damage you, as the living, make against any member of the public as they operate only under limited liability insurance and therefore are at risk to damage by your day to day activities. It is simply insurance to protect members of the public from any accidental or delinquent actions from us as private people.
3. Private Agreement - is a private agreement evidencing a contract between you and your dead at law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an agreement that evidences that there is an agreement a set of tasks and objectives between the parties. For example, it shows the strawman has agreed to accept all deposits for and on your behalf into his bank account(just look at your credit card or statement to identify whose account it is) because you cannot touch that filthy lucre. You in return, have agreed to fill out his tax return (he cannot because he is a piece of paper and is dead!) and sign it John Henry Doe FOR JOHN HENRY DOE.
Filing A UCC1 Financing Statement
Note: It is important to first create the documents below before you create your UCC1 Financing Statement
a) Security Agreement/Common Law Copyright Notice b) Hold Harmless And Indemnity Agreement c) Private Agreement d) Security Agreement e) Schedule-A for The Security Agreement f) Declaration Of Sovereignty
NOTE: Bar the Security Agreement/Common Law Copyright Notice you do not have to show/provide a) Hold Harmless And Indemnity Agreement b) Private Agreement and c) Security Agreement to any 3rd party whatsoever. These documents are for your private usage/filing. There is no law that forces you to have to disclose the contents of these documents or even provide a copy for any 3rd party. Just keep them in a safe place and do not show them to anyone unless you really want to. However, you will need to show the Security Agreement/Common Law Copyright Notice to 3rd parties from time to time as evidence that you have copyrighted your name.
Also, don't forget when creating/writing your documents to 3rd parties to use your trademark (TM) at the end of your name. There is no registration required for the TM. Joe BlowTM or Joe Blow©TM
Before You Register Your UCC1 Financing Statement You Must Have Completed A
1. Security Agreement/Common Law Copyright Notice With Number (CN), 2. Hold Harmless And Indemnity Agreement With Number (HHIA), 3. Private Agreement With Number (PA) 4. Security Agreement With Number (SA). 5. Schedule-A For Security Agreement (SA-A) 6.Declaration Of Sovereignty
The Number For Your Security Agreement/Common Law Copyright Notice Is Derived From The Date You Turned 18 (eighteen) And From The Initials Of Your Full Name e.g. JOHN ALEXANDER SMITH born 23rd May 1968 = JAS-230586-CN.
The Number For Your Hold Harmless And Indemnity Agreement Is Derived From The Date You Turned 18 (eighteen) And From The Initials Of Your Full Name e.g. John Alexander Smith born 23rd May 1968 = JAS-230586-HHIA.
The Number For Your Private Agreement Is Derived From The Date You Turned 18 (eighteen) And From The Initials Of Your Full Name e.g. John Alexander Smith born 23rd May 1968 = JAS-230586-PA.
The Number For Your Security Agreement Is Derived From The Date You Turned 18 (eighteen) And From The Initials Of Your Full Name e.g. John Alexander Smith born 23rd May 1968 = JAS-230586-SA.
You may now file your UCC-1’s
=================================================================================== Note: This Is The Most Powerful Script To Use In Court. It COUNTERS The UNUM SANCTUM And You VERBALLY Break The Spell....For Advanced Members Only. DO NOT USE THIS IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE DOING!!!
BREAKING THE SPELL & THE TRUST IN COURT....AND WINNING!
Advanced Spell Breaker Script
When the name of the trust is called for instance the “John Doe” trust, you can say, “Are you saying that the trust we are now administering is called the John Doe trust, your Honour?”
The very mention of this knowledge will put the fear of God into the Judge.
Don’t ever identify with the trust.
“We can now establish that the trust is the name of a trust ‘Not a live man’, what is your next question your Honour?”
Judge – “What is your name?”
You must be very careful not to identify with the name of the trust because doing so makes us the trustee. What does this tell you about the Judge? If we know that the Judge is the trustee, then we know that the Judge is the name, but only for this particular constructive trust.
As you will notice the Judge will become frustrated with the refusal to admit being the name, that they will issue a warrant and as soon as the man leaves they arrest him, how idiotic is that?
They must feel foolish for admitting that John Doe is not in the Court, so I’m issuing a warrant for his arrest and as soon as the man they just admitted is not there to be arrested because he is there.
They must get us to admit to being the name or they pay and we must not accept their coercion or we pay because the Judge is the Trustee, a precarious position.
The best thing to say in that case is “John Doe, is indeed in the court, your Honour.” Point to the Judge.
“It is you, as trustee, you are John Doe, today, aren’t you?”
Why not? We are men and women, we are not persons. We have Dominium.
During their frustration over not admitting to being a trust name, the trustee and/or the executor of the trust, we ought to ask who they are.
“Before we go any further, I need who you are.” Address the Clerk of the court.
“The trustee for the Cestui Que Vie trust owned by (STATE/COUNTY/PROVINCE), are you the Cestui Que Vie trustee who has appointed this Judge, as a trustee for the Cestui Que Vie trust owned by (STATE/COUNTY/PROVINCE)?”
“Are you the Cestui Que Vie trustee who has appointed this Judge as Administrator and trustee of the constructive trust case (case number(s))?”
“Did you also appoint the prosecutor as executor of this constructive trust?” Then point to the Judge.
“So you are the trustee,”, then point to prosecutor, “you are the executor, are you not? And I am the beneficiary.”
“So now we know who’s who, I as the beneficiary, I authorise you, to handle the accounting, and dissolve this constructive trust.”
This is the power we have, dissolve this confession; I’m not into sin, I’m Divine.
You are a spirit, they view you as a dead soul, lost at sea, minor, and incompetent and award of the state.
“I now claim my body, so I am collapsing the Cestui Que Vie trust, which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud against all laws likely we will not get to hear that before the Judge will order. Case Dismissed!”
Or even more likely – the prosecutor will say clutching his cheque book “We’ve withdrawn the charges.”
There are 100,000s of people doing this.
When you go to court, magistrates, you are under UCC law, this means you can only be fined.
When the Judge has a recess he can change it to Canon Law or Maritime Admiralty Law, this can sentence you to prison.
Admiralty Law is in play as you are then seen as lost at sea, you are officially stock on a port and they now have the power to store you in a warehouse (prison).
If the Judge orders the Bailiffs to throw you out of court, then you can say “Don’t do that, you are dishonouring a court official.”, because the documents have been handed to the bailiff.
If the Judge goes to leave the court for recess, then you must acknowledge – “The Judge has jumped ship, for the record, he has abandonded ship and I as Sovereignty in this court take control! Case closed! With Prejudice!”
If the Judge says they are going to have a recess, you can decline it, as it is an offer. “Your Honour, I don’t consent.”
If it is adjourned, then it stays in the same court, so just follow the above.
Always relay that “I seek leave for an Interlocketary appeal, on a matter of law.”
If you say this, the Judge will be reluctant to go to appeal because he will be losing out on commission. =========================================================================================================================================================== Intermediate Spell Breaker Script
1. Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I ask humbly for a remedy (the judge not actually being a judge and NOT desiring to provide you remedy will take a break and go into his chambers. When he returns he will have changed roles and will now be the captain of the maritime ship.)
2. Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I ask humbly for cure and maintenance. (He will now repeat the break form earlier not wanting to give you cure or remedy on his ship. Once he returns he will now have taken on the role of high priest of the temple .)
3. Your honor I wish to establish that I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I have DOMINION and NOTHING stands between myself and the divine.
Note: Use This To SHUT THEM DOWN! Get It Notarized & Authenticated. You Can Also Use This As A Spell Breaker Script In Court
NOTICE TO COURT AND ALL COURT OFFICERS
Since the Constitution cannot conflict with itself, the limited powers delegated to government by the Constitution can never supersede the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the Constitution to The American People. “Authority” is an extremely important word and concept. Government and the courts without Constitutional authority can conduct nothing lawful, and government has no authority to disparage your Rights. Keep “authority” in mind as you review the following statements and questions.
CHALLENGES TO THE COURT BEFORE PROCEEDINGS CAN START
1. A. Your Honor and the prosecutor have taken oaths of office to support and uphold the Constitution of the united States of America and that of this state. Is that correct?
B. Pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by those oaths, in the performance of your official duties, including those before this Honorable Court. Is that correct?
2. I, Jeffrey Louis Gonzales, hereby notify this Honorable Court that I am a living, breathing, natural-born American Citizen, with, and claiming, all Rights guaranteed to me in the federal and state Constitutions, and with my name properly spelled in upper and lower case letters, not as it appears on the court documents.
Is there any objection to what I just stated?
3. This court abides by all the powers of and Rights guaranteed to American Citizens in the federal and state Constitutions, including due process of law. Is that correct?
4. I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the alleged charges, presumptions and assumptions in, by and of this court, unless proven guilty by a well-informed jury of my peers, beyond a reasonable doubt, based solely on verified evidence and proof. Is that correct?
5. A. “Proof” consists of verified and demonstrated evidence, and not opinion, especially opinion unsupported by fact, law and evidence. Is that correct?
B. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” consists solely of decisions and verdicts from a well-informed jury of my peers based entirely on proof that absolutely and conclusively confirms guilt, without any reservations or questions, whatsoever, from the jury. Is that correct?
6. Opinion from any witness or prosecuting attorney unsupported and unverified by fact, law and proven evidence is simply opinion, and opinion, as previously established, is not proof or factual evidence. Is that correct?
7. A. Since I am guaranteed a fair and impartial trial, how is that possible when you, the presiding judge, the prosecuting attorney and all the witnesses against me work for and are paid by the state that is the plaintiff in this case, and my opponent? In this situation, it is impossible for me to have a fair trial. Is that correct?
B. Further, any data used against me is obtained from sources who, are also paid by the state, the same plaintiff against me. At minimum, conflict of interest takes place.
8. Since I am presumed innocent of the charges and all aspects, presumptions and assumptions of those charges and this court, I have challenged the jurisdiction of this court, which this court has not proven, on the public record. Therefore, since I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the charges and presumptions of the court, and since jurisdiction has not been proven, jurisdiction is simply a presumption of this court, of which I am presumed innocent. Furthermore, no official Oath of Office can be located anywhere, nor has one been put on the public record. Therefore, I move for dismissal of all charges and/or warrants for lack of jurisdiction. Pursuant to the foregoing, and to numerous federal and Supreme Court rulings, this case must be dismissed and any warrant recalled, with full prejudice, and I hereby move for dismissal of all charges and this case, with full prejudice.
Failure to respond to this formal written notice, dated January 23, 2007, within 30 days in written format with Proof of Service to the undersigned, constitutes and validates your fraud and failure to honor your Oath of Office. Furthermore, all said charges, judgments, warrants and/or claims against John Doe, is null and void, without force or effect or lawful power. Any further harassment of John Doe by this court or any of its officers will be construed as intentional harm, with malice and the conscious intent of inflicting both physical and mental harm to the defendant-in-error in this matter. Copies of this document along with the attached documents will be sent to the Office of Judicial Administrations, Washington DC in the event that justice is not reached.
All Rights Reserved
John Doe, American Citizen
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on this ____ day of January 2007, a true and exact copy of the aforesaid Motion was sent, first class postage prepaid, by U.S. mail, to Justin W. Wayment, ESQ. and Honorable, Kenneth H. Adams, 51 East 400 North, PO Box 1808, Cedar City, Utah 84721.
All Rights Reserved
John Doe, American Citizen
RECORDING REQUESTED BY,
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
STATE (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY)
================================================================================================================== Note: Use This To SHUT THEM DOWN! Get It Notarized & Authenticated
IN THE COURT OF THE STATE OF _________ CASE #_________________
FICTITIOUS FOREIGN STATE Vs Non corporate entity _________________ ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION
ADMIMISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION Now comes____________________ a non corporate entity with an ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE ; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4 (j) This Court is defined under FRCP Rule 4 (j) as a FOREIGN STATE as defined under 28 USC 1602 -1611 FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT (FSIA) is being jurisdictionally challenged and full disclosure of the true jurisdiction of this Court is now being demanded. Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27 1868 Chap. CCXLIX. ---An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States Whereas the rights of expatriation is a nature and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the right of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the government thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed; Thereof. Be it enacted by the Senator and the House of Representatives of the United States of American in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision, of any officers of is government which denies., restricts , impairs or questions the rights of expatriation , is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.
As an America Citizen I hold the inherent right of the 11th amendment. The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted by a Foreign State. If this FOREIGN STATE is misusing the name of this America Citizen by placing it in all caps or misusing the last name or using the term “person” as a CORPORATION all complaints and suit against such CORPORATION fall under the FSIA and the DEPT OF STATE OFFICES in Washington DC. DC now has to be notify pursuant to 22 CFR 93.1 -93.2. A copy of the FSIA has to be filed with the complaint to the defendant’s chief executive officer of that CORPORATION. MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, OR STATE COURT lacks jurisdiction to hear any case under the FOREIGN STATE definitions. This jurisdiction lies with the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT under the FSIA Statutes pursuant to 28 USC 1330. Because the Defendant is a non corporate entity and is not registered with any Secretary of State as a CORPORATION the Prosecution has FAILED to state a claim to which relief can be granted under 12(b) (6). Therefore this matter must be dismissed for lack of political, personam, and subject matter jurisdiction, Venue and under the 11th amendment. Definitions Corpus Juris Secundum "The Body of Law" or Legal encyclopedia, Volume 7, Section 4: as quoted: "Attorney & client: An Attorney's "first" duty is to the Courts (1st) and the public (2nd) and not to the client (3rd), and wherever the duties to an attorney's client "conflict" with those interests that he/she owes his allegiance to, as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter". The Biggest problem today is that People do not know their own rights & blindly entrust their rights to someone else. BLACK‘S LAW DICTIONARY FIFTH EDITION
Foreign Court The courts of a foreign state or nation. In the United States, this term is frequently applied to the courts of one of the states when their judgment or records are introduced in the courts of another.
Foreign jurisdiction Any jurisdiction foreign to that of the forum; e.g. a sister state or another country. Also the exercise by a state or nation jurisdiction beyond its own territory. Long - arm Service of process is a form of such foreign or extraterritorial jurisdiction
Foreign laws The laws of a foreign country, or of a sister state. In conflict of law, the legal principle of jurisprudence which are part of the law of a sister state or nation. Foreign laws are additions to our own laws, and in that respect are called “jus receptum”
Foreign corporation A corporation doing business in one state though chartered or incorporated in another state is a foreign corporation as to the first state, and, as such, is required to consent to certain conditions and restriction in order to do business in such first state. Under federal tax laws, a foreign corporation is one which is not organized under the law of one of the states or territories of the United States. I.R.C. § 7701 (a) (5). Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by the Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 See also Corporation
TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration ,CHAPTER 79 – DEFINITIONS Sec. 7701. Definitions (5) Foreign The term "foreign" when applied to a corporation or partnership means a corporation or partnership which is not domestic."
Foreign service of process Service of process for the acquisition of jurisdiction by a court in the United States upon a person in a foreign country is prescribed by Fed R. Civ. P. 4 (i) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1608. Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) (3)
Foreign states Nations which are outside the United States. Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state.
Profiteering Taking advantage of unusual or exceptional circumstance to make excessive profit; e.g. selling of scarce or essential goods at inflated price during time of emergency or war.
Person In general usage, a human being (i.e. nature person) thought by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, ,legal representative, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy ,or receivers. National Labor Relations act, §2(1). A corporation is a” person” within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution.
Writ of error coram nobis A common-law writ, the purpose of which is to correct a judgment in the same court in which it was rendered, on the ground of error of fact, for which it was statutes provides no other remedy, which fact did not appear of record, or was unknown to the court when judgment was pronounced, and which ,if known would have prevented the judgment, and which was unknown, and could of reasonable diligence in time to have been otherwise presented to the court, unless he was prevented from so presenting them by duress, fear, or other sufficient cause.
At common law in England, it issued from the Court of Kings Bench to a judgment of that court. Its principal aim is to afford the court in which an action was tried and opportunity to correct it own record with reference to a vital fact not known when the judgment was rendered. It is also said that at common law it lay to correct purely ministerial errors of the officers of the court.
PROOF OF SERVICE Now comes _______________ with a ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION. To be placed before the Clerk of Court of_______________________________________________ and this day of __________________ and month of____________________in the year of our Lord 2008 AD __________________[LS]
======================================================================================================================================================== Note: Use This To SHUT DOWN The Attorney. You DO NOT NEED Them! Here is How You REVOKE A Court Ordered Attorney. Get It Notarized And Authenticated
REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
Furthermore, I hereby revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to the Social Security number assigned to me, _______________________ as it pertains to my birth certificate, marriage or business license, or any other licenses or certificates issued by any and all government or quasi-governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my Sovereignty and/or property.
I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged "benefit" or gratuity associated with any of the aforementioned licenses, numbers, or certificates. I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute legal owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property.
Take Notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, governmental entities or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.
I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am of lawful age and am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.
The use of notary below is for identification only, and such use does NOT grant any jurisdiction to anyone.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved, (PRINT NAME BELOW)
_________________________________________________________________, Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris.
My Hand and Mark as Subscriber (SIGN NAME BELOW)
Date:_____________ Common Law Seal:__________________________________
On this ______day of____________, 19____, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for _______________________(state), personally appeared the above-signed, known to me to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that s/he has executed the same.
My Commission Expires:____________________________
Notice is under the jurisdiction of the American Flag of Peace of the united States of America. I, «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName», am at Peace with my government. No flag of war shall be allowed affect upon my lawful name or character. I, «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName», have entered no contract to waive any of my rights or assent to transact any right transfer away from my natural born American National Character (or same as adopted by oath). «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName»
c/o United States Post Office
«JudicialDist» Judicial District,
The State of «State»
Non Domestic Mail
A SECURITY - 15 USC
THIS IS A U.S.S.E.C. TRACER FLAG,
NOT A POINT OF LAW*
*See attached EXPLANATION SHEET
TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT OR FILING
TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT
CONTAINING THE PHRASE "A SECURITY - 15 USC"
This "EXPLANATION SHEET" is to be attached to all Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens), which are non-judicial consensual processes which arise out of breach of special performance, e.g. for public officials' breach of oath of office, a violation of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787).
The Notice is included for the purposes of Full Disclosure (UCC), and as a warning for Commercial grace. The reference to Title 15 on a Commercial Affidavit is to indicate that the Affidavit could become a U.S.S.E.C. Federal Security with tracking number.
A SECURITY - 15 USC
THIS IS A U.S.S.E.C. TRACER FLAG,
NOT A POINT OF LAW*
*One definition of "A SECURITY" is "any evidence of debt".
The Lien Claimant does NOT rely on Title 15 USC as a basis for the "Commercial Lien." All commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce (e.g. Federal Reserve Notes), must bear some sort of Federal tracking, a County Recorder's number, or a serial number, which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorder's Office or be widely advertised. When a Lien matures in three (3) months by default of the Lien Debtor through the Lien Debtor's failure to rebut the affidavit of obligation point-for-point categorically, it becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectible debt upon which assignments, collateralization, and other Commercial transactions can be based, hence it becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter U.S.S.E.C.).
The notation "A Security - 15 USC" Is a flag in Commerce telling the U.S.S.E.C. that a speculation account is being established to enforce the lien. The U.S.S.E.C. can then monitor the process. As long as the process is truthful, open, and above board (full disclosure), the U.S.S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over it, for even the U.S.S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation (Commercial Liens), and an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce.
Legal Authority: This is the best known Commercial process in America. Its prime user is the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS uses all three tracking codes. The federal code is the taxpayer's IRS document file number. The next stronger code is the County Recorder's number. The strongest, most important, most universal code is the taxpayer's identification number (TIN), also known as the Social Security Number (SSN).
The IRS collection process is legitimate. The IRS assessment process, however, is a Commercial fraud. IRS collection is not supported by any Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Liens, or by any contracts, agreements, or True Bill in Commerce establishing the basis on which any debt can be collected.
An affidavit is someone's solemn expression of truth. The foundation of the law, Commerce, and the whole legal system consists of telling the truth ("I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. . .") either by testimony, deposition, and/or by affidavit.
Every honorable judge requires those who appear before him to be sworn to tell the truth, and is compelled by the high principles of his profession to protect truth and do nothing to tamper with that truth, either directly or indirectly, in person or by proxy, or by subordination of an affiant or other party.
A judge cannot interfere with, tamper with, or in any way modify testimony without disintegrating the truth-seeking process in his sacred profession and destroying the fabric of his own occupation. To do so abrogates the 1st Amendment, which was established to protect truth. Doing so is committing professional suicide, as well as inviting countless civil and criminal repercussions.
Any judge who tampers with testimony, deposition, or affidavit, is a threat to the Commercial Peace and Dignity of the County, State, and United States of America, thereby violating the laws of all those political subdivisions and acting in the nature of a foreign, enemy Agent (a Mixed War), justifiably subject to penalties of treason.
Whoever acts against Commercial Affidavits without executing the necessary Commercial Paperwork under affidavit is subject to being charged criminally. Said charges include fraud, which is gaining at the expense of the loss of another using trickery or deception, and expand to include all violations that issue from said fraud.
Commercial processes are fundamentally non-judicial and pre-judicial. No judge, court, law, or government can invalidate these Commercial processes, i.e. an affidavit or a lien or complaint based thereon, because no third party can invalidate someone's affidavit of truth. To act against such an affidavit is to create a situation and/or enhance the condition of a Mixed War. No one can rebut an affiant except a party (e.g. a lien debtor) who alone, by his own affidavit, must speak for himself or herself if challenged. Only someone himself or herself knows his or her truth and has the right and responsibility to assert it.
A Mixed War condition exists where "authorities" have violated their oaths of office, violated the fundamental law they swore to uphold and protect, violated the codes, statutes, and regulations that govern them and in so doing disregard the peace and safety of the community by their acts, operating as Agents for undisclosed Foreign Principals or Governments against those whom they swore to protect. Such acts of Treason constitute a secret war against the people.
When an Affidavit is flagged in Commerce it becomes a Federal Document because it could become translated into a Security (for example by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien), and not accepting and/or filing a Commercial Affidavit becomes a Federal offense.
Are you now in control of your trust? You are using a notary WITH at least two living witnesses with there first name and thumb print. And We UseThem NOT For Permission RATHER Notarizing The Document Is A Court Officer AGREEING To Whatever Terms Are In The Said Contract